top of page

- Understanding Conceptual art through postmodernism,

- postmodernism (going beyond modernism)

- modernism is about thinking rationally

- Postmodernism ambiguity chaos convention of different ideas

Umbrella term to define an era that entered after/beyond modernism. Is a conventional way of living.


Background Context

Conceptual art is ambiguous. There are multiple ways to interpret the work that uses conceptual art as its foundation. It is a formalism


Clement Greenberg


Clement Greenberg stated that a painting or art should not represent the reality outside of the canvas.


He was comparing with the art back in the days where painting looks like reality (photograph).










Art should just represent itself, it doesn't have to represent the world out of it. This leads to the era of abstract painting. It questions on what form means. How can we create an internally consistent meaning (the meaning of the work is this)

This idea pushes towards sculpture. Art status is just the same as the object.


The meaning is in the organization that makes viewing of this box in a museum exist/legitimate. The Value of art is in the organization that makes it viewable.


Robert Moriss Minimalism period

In the late 1960s, Morris began introducing indeterminacy and temporality into the artistic process, referred to as Process art or Anti-Form. By cutting, dropping, or stacking everyday materials such as felt or rags, Morris emphasized the ephemeral nature of the artwork, which would ultimately change every time it was installed in a new space. This replaced what Morris posited as the fixed, static nature of Minimalist, or "object-type," art.


Robert Moriss disagrees with Clement. When looking at Jason Pollock, he said that the work has more value meaning than just the formal elements of work line shapes and etc. The subject of the work is the material. The art in conceptual art lies in the activity of the artist interacting with the world


Robert Rauschenberg White painting 1951 & 1959

- the shadow, the dust

-as airports for lights, shadows, and particles, establishing an enduring understanding of the series as receptive surfaces that respond to the world around them

- Building on this reading, Rauschenberg once referred to the works as clocks, saying that if one were sensitive enough to the subtle changes on their surfaces one could tell what time it was and what the weather was like outside

- Ultimately, the power of the White Paintings lies in the shifts in the attention they require from the viewer, asking us to slow down, watch closely over time, and inspect their mute painted surfaces for subtle shifts in color, light, and texture

John Cafe Silent Piece 1952

- the silence of the audience

- the awareness of silence and to the sound around us

- it is produced by the audience (the coughing, the chairs)

- work point to the reality of that situation

- they produce the meaning of the work collectively

- the audience produces the music


what does it mean is not relevant anymore


Andy Warhol 1962

where is the art?

- he positions himself as this passive consumer

- mass production and consumption

- repeating the same object over and over again just like in the factory

- pointing to that life or culture inside that factory (the main meaning of the artwork)


- When he first exhibited Campbell’s Soup Cans in 1962, the canvases were displayed together on shelves, like products in a grocery aisle. At the time, Campbell’s sold 32 soup varieties; each one of Warhol’s 32 canvases corresponds to a different flavor.

- Warhol said of Campbell’s soup, “I used to drink it. I used to have the same lunch every day, for 20 years, I guess, the same thing over and over again.”

- not a concern in what is in the image, whats n the conventional structure, the spaces where the work is presented


Conceptualism in art practice of the 60s and 70s


What is it?

form of art that plays around with the mind

how can thoughts be made visual and distract convention of what we know


Joseph Kosuth (1965-1975)

In One and Three Chairs, Joseph Kosuth represents one chair three ways: as a manufactured chair, as a photograph, and as a copy of a dictionary entry for the word “chair.” The installation is thus composed of an object, an image, and words.


These open-ended questions are exactly what Kosuth wanted us to think about when he said that “art is making meaning.” By assembling these three alternative representations, Kosuth turns a simple wooden chair into an object of debate and even consternation, a platform for exploring new meanings.

- 3 terms of chain (object image and text)

- viewer interpretation of the object and text

- where is the meaning? the meaning of work is in language

- what is in people's head is different

- the artwork is not in the objects





"I used common, functional objects and to the left of the object would be a full-scale photograph of it and to the right of the object would be a photostat of a definition of the object from the dictionary. Everything you saw when you looked at the object had to be the same

that you saw in the photograph, so each time the work was exhibited the new installation necessitated a new photograph. I liked that the

work itself was something other than simply what you saw. By

changing the location, the object, the photograph and still having it

remain the same work was very interesting. It meant you could have

an art work which was that idea of an art work, and its formal

components weren't important"


"the value of particular artists... can be weighed

according to how much they questioned the nature of

art... the event that made conceivable the realization

that it was possible to 'speak another language' and

still make sense in art was Marcel Duschamp's first

unassisted Ready-made ... this change - one from

'appearance to conception' - was the beginning of

modern art and the beginning of conceptual art"


Marcel Duchamp Fountain 1917

- disruptions

- putting the toilet in an unusual place

- that becomes the meaning


He states that the objects were decontextualized and displaced by changing the angle from which they are viewed and by isolating, divorcing or removing them from their normal surroundings. The addition of a title or renaming is crucial, ‘displacement from the ordinary logical context was achieved by renaming the object, the new title having no obvious relationship to the object as ordinarily understood’


Joseph Kosuth

the art I call conceptual is based on the understanding of the "linguistic nature of all ar propositions"

- artwork operates linguistically

- more valuable when more people talk about it

- the object is only a trigger

- we create our own images

- audience produce meaning collectively

- become an active consumer


Joseph Kosuth's Works

John Baldesari 1965-1975


Sol Lewitt

In conceptual art, the idea or concept is the most important aspect of the work. When an

artist uses a conceptual form of art, it means that all of the planning and decisions are made

beforehand and the execution is a perfunctory affair. The idea becomes a machine that makes the art.


- not just ideas, but to put work beforehand

- the artwork is the machine artwork

- it is the system that makes the art not the artist

- System nya apa?


A wall divided horizontally and vertically into four equal parts. Within each part, three of the four kinds of lines are superimposed.


May 1969


Black Pencil


- The artist is the one who instructs/make the machine that will be used by others

- artist is like the composer

- the artwork is in the instruction, no need to be physically made

- he give certificate to museums

- yg di beli concept nya

- concept in the form of certificate

- it is in the mind











"the plan would design the work. Some plans would require millions of variations, and some a limited number...In each case, however, the artist would select the basic form and rules that would govern the solution to the problem"


"when an artist uses a multiple modular method he usually chooses a simple and readily available form. The form itself is of very limited importance; it becomes the grammar for the total work."

1. What is the relationship between envy and glamour? How is it employed in advertising?

= Glamour works through the eye and mirror. The relationship between envy and glamour is intertwined. It cannot be separated. Doing something we can’t do in daily life. The state of being envied is what constitutes glamour.


2. What do some publicity images have in common with the tradition of oil painting?

= Publicity impersonates painting. Publicity uses devices of oil painting such as atmosphere, settings, pleasures, objects, poses, symbols of prestige, gestures, and signs of love. Enhance value and exclusiveness to everyday object. Illusion of prestige and luxury but affordable.


3. Berger identifies 3 dreams that publicity offers us – name these three dreams

= The dream of later tonight (source of pleasure), The Skin Dream, The dream of a faraway place.


4. Berger states that publicity works on our anxieties in two specific ways – what are these?

= Anxiety about money and fear of not being unenviable.


5. What is the “general proposal” that publicity makes to its viewers?

= Publicity is the way of life we aspire to. If we buy the product, our life will be different from what it is. It proposes to each of us in a consumer society that we can change ourselves or our lives by buying something more. It promotes an illusion. People thinks that those who lack glamour is non-existent.


6. What is the philosophical system behind publicity?

= Publicity suggests that you are inadequate as you are, but it consoles you with the promise of a dream. It appeals to a way of life we aspire to, but have not yet achieved.

The language of advertising

Ad speaks to "us" through modes of address. It intends to "talk" to us by incorporating the word "you" in the ads.


Ads speak to the consumer in a folksy or cheeky dilly tone, as if the as and the consumer was "having a nice chat". Convincing mass consumers will make product unique and different while consumer only one


The word "You" promotes the concept of Pseudo-individuality - a false idea of individuality which is a process of homogenization. You are all the same. This implies the erasure of differences in needs. Tries obliterate differences, uniqueness


Presumption of relevance

The world that ads presented is highly fictional and artificial. The word 'you' in ads implies that the product is assumed to be relevant to 'all', including the poor.


The process of self-marginalization and self-realization occur at an individual level. The exclusivity and the inclusivity of the world you is done "voluntarily" by the viewer to judge whether the car is meant for you or not.



Follow the flow to be not left behind. The reason is that the company have workers so they have to give worker works. To keep innovating, they have to keep making excuses using advertising. The image is artificial, fantasy, and it creates drama. Ads create impossible to become possible.


For example, a car in the mountain when actually in real life we dont go to the mountains using cars


This process of homogenization continues also in the production of "presumption of relevance" in advertising images through the differentiation and proposition.


For example, in this ad, a dark-colored female figure is propositioned with an animal. The assumption is that this female person is an African native who has the "aura" of a specific animal from that region - the tiger of Africa. This in itself is already encouraging a racial type of interpretation in the part of the viewer.


The message in context would be that an exotic black woman is similar to a predator. It is a play that is amusing but dangerous







Creating differences

The openness of competition


We know companies compete with each other, but some ads differentiate themselves from others. In short, as an example, mac speaks more to the youth, young hip people. Mac has a fixed target market and the cultural class is fixed. The images that they are producing shows it. Mac is trying to stereotype.



Ads participate in the capitalist society via this idea of therapeutic ideology


All ads speak the language of "transformation".


They tell their viewers that their products will change lives for the better - if they buy a particular product/package. This relates to therapeutic ideology. They assume we don't like our appearance relationship job.


Perfect Figures in Ads


Many ads imply that their product or what they offer can alleviate this state of dissatisfaction. They do this by presenting figures, objects, or illusions of glamour so that the consumer feels "envy" and wish to "emulate". The person we see in ads is presented as already transformed, and bodies that appear as perfect. Perfection is the ultimate goal of capitalism's organization of what constitutes "normal". It is just an illusion.


Most ads tend to produce a narrative of the "ideal body". Ads speak to our unconscious realm in terms of "self-management, and self-discipline". If not there will be some form of punishment or "guilt" that consumer tends to impose on themselves.





What is the standard bodies? Or is the body standardized?


Michel Foucault named this process as production of "docile bodies" to the consumer, meaning that our body should be governed, "socially trained, regulated and managed by cultural norms/laws. Consumers are incited by ads to seek individuality by conforming to particular standards of "beauty" or "ideal self".








It has become typical that the use of body parts, such as legs, lips, breasts, and hair, have become represent ed as "fetishized parts". Even gestures that allude to erotica are used for communications in advertising images.


This narrative or gesture that alludes to erotica or sexual pleasure is either literally or metaphorically communicated in certain ads. It can be argued that it is "pornography".


The idea of sexual pleasure is "normalized" or "tamed" and embedded inside the product as well as inside the viewer's psyche.




Today's Advertisement


Today's ads work differently.

And through social media platforms, ads no longer sit apart in a distance billboard.


It has entered into our private space. The introduction of "docile bodies", envy and glamour is way more subtle in its promotion and socialization by "everyday" citizens. Actors or models sits "among" us. The promotion of a healthy lifestyle, eating right is seemingly promoted and socialized "casually" and "voluntarily" by the netizen.


Today we are confronted by numerous "self-publicity" images and models backed up by giant corporations. We consumed ads publicly in the past. Nowadays, ads penetrate private space. The themes changes from masculine, heroic into private daily life. Ads enter micro and are intervening in our private space. Models in ads are no longer seen in billboard but it becomes among us.


The Mirror Stage

Is Lacan's theory of separation experienced as a splitting which marks the point from which we recognize ourselves as "subjects" apart from others via the mirror stage.


At the age of 2-6 years, the child develops a sense of self and identity and recognizes himself or herself as a separate entity from the mother through looking at the mirror.


This moment of the splitting of the self and the image, the self begins to recognize his or her self as an incomplete figure, as a figure of "forever lack".


Jacques Lacan

"desire and lack are central motivating forces in our lives. Our lives are structured by a sense of lack from the moment that we recognize that we are separate entities from our mothers."


Therefore, we are always searching to return to some state of wholeness that we believe we once had. We constantly consume products, to fill that lack. It is our human nature to nurture our sense of lack. We want to achieve something because we sense ourselves that we are lacking


Packaging Memory Advertisements

Many ads reach back to the past. They attach concepts of memory and history to their products. In creating an equivalence between products and symbols of the past, these ads are packaging memory into easily understood signs.


Therefore, we consume the product to fill that lack. Advertising speak to our desire so compellingly. It creates fantasies of the idea. Ads arefacilitating to this childhood phase. Advertising studies psychology


When we are independent we realize that we are not one body with our mother, that's when we sense of lack. Ads speak to the consumer in nostalgic terms. It connects to the earlier times. Makin us emotional.


Ads with Ideological Agendas

Let us consider the larger context in which ads or commodity signs operate. It speaks to represent "nations" or even "democracy". Here ads have ideological agendas. Ads, or the mass media, can be used to influence our thinking and to shape certain dogma.


The ideological function of the ad takes the form of speaking a language of patriotism and nationalism. In other words, ads that use an image of Indonesia, or other nations to market their products, are selling the concept that in order to be a good citizen and to properly participate in the nation, one must be an active consumer.


These products are presented as the means by which we can participate in national ideology.


Ads Establishing Codes of Difference

There are also ads that wanted to establish codes of difference. This usually takes the form of representation of "others" or otherness in the commercial ads. Ads wanted to speak to their consumer about a particular product of how they are naturally sophisticated. And one of these strategies is to represent the exotic other.


Typically this is communicated through the binaries of east and west. The white and the non-white. The non-western person and western person. Traditionally race has been used in advertising or commercial or in films to give a product a kind of "exoticism and foreignness.



According to Marx....we can see how commodity fetishism operates as a process of mystification, obscuring the complex reality of colonized places and former colonies in order to attach the meaning of difference in products. Ironically while these products promise to white consumers the qualities of otherness commodity culture are about the denial of difference.


Markers of ethnicity and race are used in ads to demonstrate social or racial and humanitarian values and to give the product an element of cultural sophistication. The point is cultural difference sells. The incorporation of multicultural diversity as a conceptual framework into the promotional campaign render the product as well as the company "hip" and "fashionable" and "progressive".


Some ads are encouraging and empowering to some, but can we actually buy "multiculturalism". The company seems to say, "you can!" But what exactly are we buying, or wear?

bottom of page